Work

See where disconnected systems become an operating problem.

These representative use cases show the buying trigger, the failure beneath the symptom, and a practical systems response. They are operating scenarios, not claims about a specific client engagement.

Commercial Construction

Representative use case

Close the gap between project budgets, actual costs, and WIP.

Procore · Sage 300 CRE

Procore holds budgets, commitments, change orders, and field activity. Sage 300 CRE holds actual costs, payroll, and AP. Both systems are doing the jobs they were designed to do, but a controller or project accountant has to reconcile the seam between them in Excel before the company can produce WIP.

Buying trigger

Project volume grows, monthly close stretches, and job-cost variance is already stale when ownership sees it.

What is actually breaking

Cost-code structures drift apart

The same expense can land in different buckets across the project and accounting systems. A generic one-to-one connector cannot safely resolve years of custom cost-code decisions.

Commitments and actuals never meet at the source

Subcontracts live in Procore while invoices live in Sage, so remaining commitment requires opening both systems and reconstructing the answer.

Approved changes reach finance late

A change order updates the project system immediately but reaches accounting on a separate manual schedule, making every report between those events incomplete.

Compliance packages are rebuilt by hand

Certified payroll, prevailing-wage records, and monthly owner or GC reporting are assembled from both systems every cycle, so the same reconciliation happens a second time for compliance after it already happened for WIP.

A better setup

  1. 1Map before integratingInventory cost codes, document the reconciliation workflow, assign system ownership, and identify the exceptions that cannot be automated safely.
  2. 2Create a governed mapping layerPreserve both systems while maintaining explicit cost-code mappings and routing unresolved codes for review instead of silently mis-posting them.
  3. 3Synchronize the financial handoffsMove commitments and approved changes toward accounting, return actual costs and invoice status to project teams, and assemble a repeatable WIP package from governed data.

Intended operating result

Finance spends less time rebuilding the operating picture, project leaders see current committed-versus-actual cost, and neither Procore nor Sage has to be replaced.

Logistics & Freight

Representative use case

Turn freight documents into load, invoice, and settlement events.

McLeod LoadMaster · QuickBooks Enterprise

Rate confirmations, BOLs, PODs, customs paperwork, and receipts arrive by email, text, and driver photos in English and Spanish. Staff read each document, identify the load, and retype its fields into the TMS before invoicing or settlement can move.

Buying trigger

Load volume outgrows the back office, PODs delay invoicing, and cross-border paperwork depends on one bilingual employee.

What is actually breaking

Documents have no front door

Paperwork is spread across inboxes, phone numbers, driver messages, and shared folders, so operations cannot answer whether a required document has arrived from one place.

Shipper formats live in employee memory

Each customer formats paperwork differently. The rules for reading it are learned informally and leave the business when an experienced administrator does.

Cross-border work runs on a parallel track

Customs records, broker confirmations, and Mexican carrier documents require bilingual handling outside the standard intake process, creating a single point of failure.

Settlement is reconstructed at week-end

Driver and carrier pay is assembled from whatever records can be found, so missing or mismatched documentation becomes a recurring dispute instead of an early exception.

A better setup

  1. 1Create one document pipelineBring email, SMS, and driver-app submissions into one intake path, classify each document, and match it to a load before posting.
  2. 2Extract with confidence controlsTune extraction for actual shipper formats in both languages. Post high-confidence fields to McLeod and send ambiguous records to a human with the relevant context.
  3. 3Trigger the downstream workUse a verified POD to release invoicing and use already-matched records to assemble driver and carrier settlement, surfacing exceptions during the week.

Intended operating result

Documents move into the TMS with controlled review, invoicing begins when proof is complete, settlement is built from records, and cross-border handling no longer depends on one person.

Recognize one of these?

See what this is costing you.

Start with an assessment. We trace the workflow, find where the margin is going, and hand back an ordered plan.

See the assessment