Commercial Construction
Representative use caseClose the gap between project budgets, actual costs, and WIP.
Procore · Sage 300 CRE
Procore holds budgets, commitments, change orders, and field activity. Sage 300 CRE holds actual costs, payroll, and AP. Both systems are doing the jobs they were designed to do, but a controller or project accountant has to reconcile the seam between them in Excel before the company can produce WIP.
Buying trigger
Project volume grows, monthly close stretches, and job-cost variance is already stale when ownership sees it.
What is actually breaking
Cost-code structures drift apart
The same expense can land in different buckets across the project and accounting systems. A generic one-to-one connector cannot safely resolve years of custom cost-code decisions.
Commitments and actuals never meet at the source
Subcontracts live in Procore while invoices live in Sage, so remaining commitment requires opening both systems and reconstructing the answer.
Approved changes reach finance late
A change order updates the project system immediately but reaches accounting on a separate manual schedule, making every report between those events incomplete.
Compliance packages are rebuilt by hand
Certified payroll, prevailing-wage records, and monthly owner or GC reporting are assembled from both systems every cycle, so the same reconciliation happens a second time for compliance after it already happened for WIP.
A better setup
- 1Map before integratingInventory cost codes, document the reconciliation workflow, assign system ownership, and identify the exceptions that cannot be automated safely.
- 2Create a governed mapping layerPreserve both systems while maintaining explicit cost-code mappings and routing unresolved codes for review instead of silently mis-posting them.
- 3Synchronize the financial handoffsMove commitments and approved changes toward accounting, return actual costs and invoice status to project teams, and assemble a repeatable WIP package from governed data.
Intended operating result
Finance spends less time rebuilding the operating picture, project leaders see current committed-versus-actual cost, and neither Procore nor Sage has to be replaced.