Commercial construction reporting
WIP schedules, job cost variance by project and by project manager, committed versus actual by cost code, over- and under-billing, labor productivity, cash flow forecasting by project, and owner reporting packages.
Cano Solutions service
The payoff for connected systems
Most companies in these industries already own a reporting tool they do not use. The tool was rarely the problem. The data underneath it was never reliable enough to make a decision on, and the measures were never defined or owned. Once the systems are connected and the handoffs are governed, the numbers are finally trustworthy and almost nobody has built anything with them. This is not a dashboard engagement. It is about numbers that are correct.
Talk through your situationWhat we usually find
What should change
Where this helps
WIP schedules, job cost variance by project and by project manager, committed versus actual by cost code, over- and under-billing, labor productivity, cash flow forecasting by project, and owner reporting packages.
Load and lane profitability, revenue per truck and per mile, carrier scorecards, on-time performance, days to invoice, detention and accessorial capture, driver retention, and cross-border dwell time.
Establish which system owns each measure, document the definitions so they survive turnover, and deliver the reporting where the decision actually gets made rather than in a tool nobody opens.
Working together
Where we apply it
Questions
Often the tool is fine. The usual reason it went unused is that the data underneath it was not reliable, or the measures were never defined and owned. That is the work, and it is mostly upstream of the tool.
Usually some of it. Reporting on data the business does not trust produces arguments rather than decisions. We will tell you what has to be connected first and what can be reported on as it stands.
Start with the problem
Send a short description. We will read it and reply with a useful place to start.
Start a conversation